54% of internet users aged 18-65 say they generally don’t trust sponsored content, with most of the remainder only trusting such content if they trust the publication it runs on (19%) or they already trust the brand (23%). That’s according to survey results from Contently, which also found that two-thirds of respondents have at some point felt deceived upon realizing that an article or video they read was sponsored by a brand.
A survey conducted by Hexagram and Spada found that 8 in 10 publishers and 2 in 3 brands that have used native advertising reported having received no backlash at all to their use of the campaigns. That’s despite almost 6 in 10 respondents to the Contently survey claiming that they think a news site loses credibility if it runs articles sponsored by a brand.
Two-thirds of respondents to the Contently survey said they would not be as likely to click on an article sponsored by a brand as they would to click on editorial content. 57% said they would prefer that their favorite news sites ran banner ads instead of sponsored articles (assuming the sponsor would have some influence over the content).
Finally, in a relative ranking of perceived quality, respondents ranked articles in print newspapers and print magazines as having the highest quality, followed in descending order by: articles on a news website; advertorials in a printed magazine; sponsored articles on a news website; articles on a brand’s website, and blog posts by mommy bloggers.
About the Data: The data is based on a survey of 542 US internet users aged 18-65. Some 53% are male, and close to 6 in 10 are aged 18-44.